Home 
Common diagnoses Comparison of different techniques for cervical conization
Common diagnoses Comparison of different techniques for cervical conization
Comparison of different techniques for cervical conization
Advantages | Disadvantages |
Cold knife conization | |
| Technical simplicity | General or regional anesthetic required |
| Excellent specimen quality | Distortion after healing |
| Complication rate higher | |
Laser conization | |
| Good specimen quality | Technically difficult |
| Good hemostasis | Expense and upkeep of equipment |
| Healing with minimal distortion | Some thermal damage |
| Low complication rate | A narrow deep cone is difficult |
| Can be done in an office setting | |
| Flexible treatment of endocervix | |
Large loop excision of the transformation zone | |
| Easily done in the office setting | Some thermal damage |
| Rapid performance | A large or deep cone may be difficult to perform in the office and result in more thermal damage if a second loop excision is required |
| Technically easy | |
| Equipment inexpensive | |
| Low complication rate | |
| Good specimen quality | |
| Healing with minimal distortion | |